Effects of Computer Assisted Audit Techniques on Quality of Internal Audit Reports in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v3.i1.2Keywords:
CAATS, Quality Internal Audi Reports, Report writing, Data collection, Data analysisAbstract
This study explores how Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques (CAATs) affect the quality of internal audit reports in Kenyan businesses. Modern auditing now relies heavily on CAATs as a key instrument for efficiency improvement, comprehensive data collection, and confidentiality protection. This study investigates the use of technology in the audit process, emphasizing its potential to boost productivity, gather significant amounts of data, speed up the decision-making process, and protect data privacy. The theoretical framework draws from two main theories: Performance Expectancy Theory and Contingency Theory. The research reviews existing empirical studies to underscore CAATs' positive and negative influences on internal audit reports. It highlights the need for proper training and support to harness CAATs' potential effectively. Challenges, including the lack of resources, conflicts of interest, and difficulties in implementation, are identified. The study concludes that while CAATs offer numerous advantages in auditing, their successful integration requires a balance between technology, training, and human expertise. As the audit profession continues to evolve, understanding the implications of CAATs on internal audit reports is crucial for ensuring the integrity and quality of financial information in all sectors.
Downloads
References
Al Matarneh, G. F. (2011). Factors determining the internal audit quality in banks: Empirical Evidence from Jordan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 73(9), 99-108. https://www.academia.edu/download/34870170/Factors_Determining_the_Internal_Audit_Quality_in_Banks.pdf
Arena, M., & Azzone, G. (2007). Internal audit departments: Adoption and characteristics in Italian companies. International Journal of Auditing, 11(2), 91-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00357.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00357.x
Bierstaker, J. L., Burnaby, P., & Thibodeau, J. (2001). The impact of information technology on the audit process: an assessment of the state of the art and implications for the future. Managerial Auditing Journal, 16(3), 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900110385489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900110385489
Boritz, J. E. 2003. Computer Control and Audit Guide. 12th ed. Waterloo: University of Waterloo.
Braun, R. L., & Davis, H. E. (2003). Computer‐assisted audit tools and techniques: analysis and perspectives. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(9), 725-731. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310500488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310500488
Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link?. Management science, 49(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.3.273.12736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.3.273.12736
Flint, D. (1988). Philosophy and principles of auditing. Hampshire: Macmillan Education Ltd.
Jaber, R. J., & Abu Wadi, R. M. (2018). Auditors’ usage of computer-assisted audit techniques (caats): Challenges and opportunities. In Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era: 17th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2018, Kuwait City, Kuwait, October 30–November 1, 2018, Proceedings 17 (pp. 365-375). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02131-3_33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02131-3_33
Kamau, C. G., Kavure, B. M., & Lokuta, J. E. (2023a). Audit Expectation Gap in Kenya: Literature Review of Causes and Remedies. East African Finance Journal, 2(1), 25-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v2.i1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v2.i1.4
Kamau, C., Oyoti, R., & Muzungu, B. K. (2023b). Effect of Corporate governance on Financial Distress among the Firms Listed at Nairobi Securities Exchange. South Sahara Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(1), 1-7. http://ssapub.com/index.php/ssmj/article/view/1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61250/ssmj/v1.i1.1
KPMG (2015). Data & Analytics enabled Internal Audit. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/04/DA-Enabled-Internal-Audit-Survey.pdf
Mahzan, N., & Lymer, A. (2008, April). Adoption of computer assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by internal auditors: current issues in the UK. In BAA Annual Conference (pp. 1-46). https://eprints.um.edu.my/8615/
Midecha, A. (2022). Internal Auditor’s Role and Corporate Financial Performance in Kenya. African Journal of Commercial Studies, 1(1), 36-42. https://n2t.net/ark:/69431/AJoCS.v1i1.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v1.i1.5
Njagi, M. (2023). Independence of Internal Auditors: Significance, Guidelines, and Influencing Factors. East African Finance Journal, 2(1), 56-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v2.i1.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v2.i1.8
Pedrosa, I., & Costa, C. J. (2012). Computer assisted audit tools and techniques in real world: CAATT's applications and approaches in context. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 161-168. http://mirlabs.org/ijcisim/regular_papers_2012/Paper18.pdf
Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2015). Accounting Information System. Thirteen Edition
Sayana, S. A., & Cisa, C. (2003). Using CAATs to support IS audit. Information systems control journal, 1, 21-23. http://csbweb01.uncw.edu/people/IvancevichD/classes/MSA%20516/Extra%20Readings%20on%20Topics/CAATS/Supplemental%20Reading%20Week%208/Using%20CAATTS%20to%20Support%20IT%20Audit.pdf
Saygili, A. T. (2010). Taking advantage of computer assisted audit tools and techniques during testing phase in financial audits: An empirical study in a food processing company in Turkey. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 10(2), 113-119. https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume10/gjmbr_vol10_issue2_13.pdf
Singleton, T., & Flesher, D. L. (2003). A 25‐year retrospective on the IIA’s SAC projects. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(1), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310454237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310454237
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 African Journal of Commercial Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.