Project Implementation Practices and Project Performance of the Integrated Housing Projects in Laikipia County, Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v5.i2.9Keywords:
Project Implementation Practices, Stakeholder Engagement, MEAL, Project Planning, Project Performance, Integrated HousingAbstract
This study examined the effect of project implementation practices on the performance of the Integrated Housing Project implemented by Habitat for Humanity Kenya (HFHK) in Laikipia County, Kenya. Specifically, it assessed the effect of stakeholder engagement practices, Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning (MEAL) practices, and project planning practices on project performance, and investigated the mediating role of organizational capacity in this relationship. A descriptive case study research design was adopted targeting a population of 128 respondents comprising HFHK project staff, community beneficiaries, and local government representatives directly involved in the project. A census approach was employed, yielding 101 completed questionnaires (79% response rate). Structured questionnaires with five-point Likert-scale items were administered and data analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 26 through descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression analysis. The study was anchored on the Ladder of Participation Theory, Empowerment Theory, and Systems Theory. Diagnostic tests for normality, multicollinearity, linearity, and homoscedasticity confirmed that all regression assumptions were satisfied. All three implementation practice variables significantly and positively influenced project performance. Stakeholder engagement practices had a statistically significant effect (β = 0.523, p < 0.05, R² = 0.274). MEAL practices recorded the highest individual R² (β = 0.602, p < 0.05, R² = 0.362). Project planning practices recorded the strongest bivariate correlation with performance (β = 0.582, p < 0.05, R² = 0.339). The combined model explained 46.0% of the variance in project performance (R² = 0.460, F = 21.456, p < 0.05). Organizational capacity partially mediated the relationship between implementation practices and performance, increasing the model's explanatory power to 55.5% (R² = 0.555, β = 0.174, p < 0.05). Development organizations should institutionalize participatory stakeholder engagement mechanisms, strengthen MEAL systems for real-time learning and adaptive management, and invest in comprehensive project planning to enhance performance and sustainability. Strengthening organizational capacity amplifies the benefits of all three implementation practices.
Downloads
References
Amolo, A., & Niyizigihe, O. (2025). Project management practices in integrated housing development. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 14(1), 215–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v14i1.4018
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
Badewi, A. (2016). The impact of project management and benefits management practices on project success. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 761–778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.05.005
Botes, L., & van Rensburg, D. (2020). Community participation in development: Nine plagues and twelve commandments. Community Development Journal, 55(1), 55–73.
Chambers, R. (2017). Can we know better? Reflections for development. Practical Action Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780449449.000
Chepkwony, A. K., Muchelule, Y. W., & Somba, S. M. (2024). Project integration management and performance of National Housing Corporation projects in Kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences Management and Entrepreneurship, 39(3), 93–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i7/18703
Christens, B. D. (2019). Community power and empowerment. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1), 4–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190605582.003.0001
Cornwall, A. (2016). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, K., & Crawford, L. (2021). Organizational capability and project performance. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(2), 303–328.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
García, R., & Kumar, S. (2021). Stakeholder engagement and its impact on project success in the housing sector. International Journal of Project Management, 39(3), 379–389.
Habitat for Humanity Kenya. (2023a). Integrated housing project: Annual progress report. HFHK.
Habitat for Humanity Kenya. (2023b). Laikipia integrated housing initiative: Project brief. HFHK.
Ika, L. A., & Donnelly, J. (2017). Success conditions for international development capacity building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 44–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.005
Kaplan, A. (2000). Capacity building: Shifting the paradigms of practice. Development in Practice, 10(3–4), 517–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520050116677
Kerzner, H. (2022). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (13th ed.). Wiley.
Khang, D. B., & Moe, T. L. (2008). Success criteria and factors for international development projects: A life-cycle-based framework. Project Management Journal, 39(1), 72–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20034
KIPPRA. (2021). Kenya economic report 2021: Mobilizing resources for post-COVID-19 recovery. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis.
Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/11269
Muriuki, A., & Nyandemo, S. (2021). Monitoring and evaluation practices in Kenyan housing projects: Implications for project success. African Journal of Project Management, 12(3), 45–59.
Muthini, K. J., & Nyang’au, S. (2022). Project management practices and completion of government housing projects in Makueni County, Kenya. Journal of Social Sciences Management and Entrepreneurship, 39(3), 93–106.
Mwakio, S., Oyoo, J. J., & Onyiego, G. (2023). Effect of project management practices on performance of public housing construction projects in Kenya: A case study of Mombasa County. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 7(4), 1547–1566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v7i4.1882
Nguyen, T. P., Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., & Wood, A. (2019). External and internal factors influencing the effectiveness of organizational strategies in delivering construction project outcomes. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(10), 2291–2309.
Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (7th ed.). PMI.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
UN-Habitat. (2019). Housing at the centre: The role of implementation in achieving sustainable development. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
UNDP. (2020). Human development report 2020. United Nations Development Programme.
UNDP. (2022). Results-based management handbook: Strengthening RBM in UNDP. United Nations Development Programme.
Valencia, J., Mugisha, J., & Nuwagaba, A. (2022). Systems thinking in project management: A holistic approach to project success. Project Management Journal, 53(2), 145–158.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
Wanjau, C. M., Namusonge, G. S., & Lango, B. (2024). Project team planning and performance of housing projects in Kenya. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management, 9(1), 12–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47941/jepm.1653
World Bank. (2017). Development projects: Trends and performance. World Bank Publications.
Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hamidah Leruk, Charles Katua Kithandi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




