Empirical Market Microstructure Models: A Review of Trading Behavior, Liquidity, and Price Formation

Authors

  • Farzan A. Omar Department of Accounting and Finance , Technical University of Mombasa image/svg+xml Author
  • Samson Kaplelach Department of Accounting and Finance , Technical University of Mombasa image/svg+xml Author
  • Harrison Kiema Department of Accounting and Finance , Technical University of Mombasa image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v5.i2.5

Keywords:

Empirical Market Microstructure, Liquidity, Bid-Ask Spread, Price Impact, Inventory Costs, Information Asymmetry, Inventory Models, Adverse Selection, Hybrid Model

Abstract

This paper reviews empirical market microstructure models and their role in explaining trading behavior, liquidity, price formation, and transaction costs in financial markets. Market microstructure research examines how financial securities are traded and how trading mechanisms, order flow, and information asymmetry influence market outcomes. Unlike traditional financial theories that assume perfect and frictionless markets, market microstructure focuses on the actual trading process, including how prices are determined, how liquidity is provided, and how information is reflected in market prices. The study mainly relied on a literature review approach using secondary sources from academic journals, books, reports, and reputable databases. The review examined classical empirical market microstructure frameworks, focusing on adverse selection models, inventory models, and hybrid models. Classical theories such as the Kyle model, Glosten–Milgrom model, Stoll model, and Ho–Stoll model were reviewed together with more recent hybrid and algorithmic trading frameworks such as the Madhavan–Richardson–Roomans model and the Avellaneda–Stoikov model. The findings show that empirical market microstructure models have evolved from traditional dealer-based frameworks to more advanced models using high-frequency trading data, electronic order books, and algorithmic trading systems. The review further shows that liquidity, bid-ask spreads, and price discovery are influenced by information asymmetry, inventory risk, order processing costs, and trading technology. The study concludes that hybrid empirical models provide a broader explanation of modern market behavior because they combine information effects and inventory management within a single framework. However, many traditional models remain limited by assumptions of rational behavior and perfect information processing. The study recommends further empirical research focusing on emerging markets and the integration of behavioral finance and machine learning approaches into market microstructure analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avellaneda, M., & Stoikov, S. (2008). High-frequency trading in a limit order book. Quantitative Finance, 8(3), 217–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680701381228

Baker, H.K and Kiymaz, H. (2013), Market Microstructure in Emerging and Developed Markets. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118681145

Barberis, N. (2018). Psychology-based models of asset prices and trading volume. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 10(1), 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w24723

Boulatov, A., & George, T. J. (2022). Hidden liquidity and informed trading in fragmented markets. Journal of Financial Markets, 58, 100689.

Cartea, Á., Jaimungal, S., & Penalva, J. (2015). Algorithmic and high-frequency trading. Cambridge University Press.

Easley, D., Kiefer, N. M., & O’Hara, M. (1996). Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks. Journal of Finance, 51(4), 1405–1436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb04074.x

Easley, D. et al. (2001). Is information risk a determinant of asset returns? The Journal of Finance, 57 (5): 2185–2221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00493

Ellis, K. et al. (2000). The accuracy of trade classification rules: Evidence from Nasdaq. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 35(4), 529–551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2676254

Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x

Fama, E. F. (2021). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. University of Chicago Press.

Glosten, L. R., & Milgrom, P. R. (1985). Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 71–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90044-3

Grammig, J., & Theissen, E. (2002). Estimation of the probability of informed trading—Does trade misclassification matter? Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.367041

Harris, L (2003), Trading and Exchanges, Market Microstructure for Practitioners. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195144703.001.0001

Hasbrouck, J. (1991). Measuring the information content of stock trades. The Journal of Finance, 46(1): 179–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03749.x

Hasbrouck, J. (2007). Empirical Market Microstructure: The Institutions, Economics, and Econometrics of Securities Trading. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195301649.001.0001

Ho, T., & Stoll, H. R. (1981). Optimal dealer pricing under transactions and return uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(81)90020-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(81)90020-9

Ho, T., & Stoll, H. R. (1989). The dynamics of dealer markets under competition. Journal of Finance, 44(4), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2328632

Ighoyivwi, M. O., & Ehiedu, V. C. (2025). Impact of market microstructure on price efficiency and liquidity in emerging capital markets. International Journals of Academic Research World, 9(5), 202–208.

Krause, A. (2003) Inventory effects on daily returns in financial markets. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 6: 739-765 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024903002171

Kyle, A. S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica, 53(6), 1315–1335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913210

Lei, Q., & Wu, G. (2005). Time-varying informed and uninformed trading activities. Journal of Financial Markets, 8(2): 153–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2004.09.002

Madhavan, A., Richardson, M., & Roomans, E. (1997). Why do security prices change? A transaction-level analysis of NYSE stocks. Review of Financial Studies, 10(4), 1035–1064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/10.4.1035

Madhavan, A. (2000). Market microstructure: A survey. Journal of Financial Markets, 3(3): 205–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(00)00007-0

Menkveld, A. J. (2013). High frequency trading and the new market makers. Journal of Financial Markets, 16(4), 712–740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2013.06.006

O’Hara, M. (1995). Market Microstructure Theory. Blackwell Publishers.

OECD. (2024). Business insights on emerging markets 2024. OECD Publishing

Stoll, H. R. (1978). The supply of dealer services in securities markets. Journal of Finance, 33(4), 1133–1151. https://doi.org/10.2307/2326598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1978.tb02053.x

Stoll, H.R (1989), Inferring the Components of the Bid-Ask spread: Theory and Empirical Tests, Journal of Finance, 44: 115-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb02407.x

University of Bologna. (2024). Market microstructure and algorithmic trading. University of Bologna Press.

Venter, J. H., & De Jongh, P. J. (2002). Extensions to the probability of informed trading model. South African Journal of Economics, 70(4), 705–718

Downloads

Published

2026-05-13

How to Cite

Omar, F. A., Kaplelach, S., & Kiema, H. (2026). Empirical Market Microstructure Models: A Review of Trading Behavior, Liquidity, and Price Formation. East African Finance Journal, 5(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v5.i2.5

Article PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics