Effect of Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning (MEAL) Practices on Project Performance of the Integrated Housing Projects in Laikipia County, Kenya

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v5.i2.7

Keywords:

MEAL, Monitoring and Evaluation, Accountability, Learning, Project Performance, Integrated Housing project

Abstract

This study examined the effect of stakeholder engagement practices on the performance of the Integrated Housing Project implemented by Habitat for Humanity Kenya (HFHK) in Laikipia County, Kenya. A descriptive case study design was adopted, targeting 128 respondents comprising HFHK project staff, community beneficiaries, and local government representatives. Structured questionnaires were administered and data analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 26. Both descriptive and inferential statistics, including Pearson correlation and simple linear regression analysis, were employed alongside diagnostic tests for normality, multicollinearity, linearity, and homoscedasticity. Stakeholder engagement practices had a positive and statistically significant effect on project performance (β = 0.523, p < 0.05), with stakeholder engagement explaining 27.4% of the variance in project performance (R² = 0.274). Descriptive analysis (Mean = 3.88, SD = 0.83) confirmed that community participation, feedback integration, and local partnerships were actively practised, though perceptions varied across respondent categories. The regression model was statistically significant (F = 36.789, p < 0.05). Development organizations should institutionalize structured stakeholder engagement mechanisms across all project phases. Meaningful participation beyond tokenistic consultation enhances project ownership, accountability, quality, timeliness, and beneficiary satisfaction. This study contributes localized empirical evidence on stakeholder engagement in NGO-led integrated housing projects in rural Kenya, an underexplored context in project management literature

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amolo, A., & Niyizigihe, O. (2025). Project management practices in integrated housing development. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 14(1), 215–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v14i1.4018

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

Badewi, A. (2016). The impact of project management and benefits management practices on project success. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 761–778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.05.005

Chambers, R. (2017). Can we know better? Reflections for development. Practical Action Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780449449.000

Christens, B. D. (2019). Community power and empowerment. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1), 4–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190605582.003.0001

Cornwall, A. (2016). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

García, R., & Kumar, S. (2021). Stakeholder engagement and its impact on project success in the housing sector. International Journal of Project Management, 39(3), 379–389.

Habitat for Humanity Kenya. (2023a). Integrated housing project: Annual progress report. HFHK.

Habitat for Humanity Kenya. (2023b). Laikipia integrated housing initiative: Project brief. HFHK.

Ika, L. A., & Donnelly, J. (2017). Success conditions for international development capacity building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 44–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.005

Kerzner, H. (2022). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (13th ed.). Wiley.

Khang, D. B., & Moe, T. L. (2008). Success criteria and factors for international development projects: A life-cycle-based framework. Project Management Journal, 39(1), 72–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20034

KIPPRA. (2021). Kenya economic report 2021: Mobilizing resources for post-COVID-19 recovery. Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis.

Kusek, J. Z., & Rist, R. C. (2004). Ten steps to a results-based monitoring and evaluation system. World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/11269

Muriuki, A., & Nyandemo, S. (2021). Monitoring and evaluation practices in Kenyan housing projects: Implications for project success. African Journal of Project Management, 12(3), 45–59.

Muthini, K. J., & Nyang’au, S. (2022). Project management practices and completion of government housing projects in Makueni County, Kenya. Journal of Social Sciences Management and Entrepreneurship, 39(3), 93–106.

Mwakio, S., Oyoo, J. J., & Onyiego, G. (2023). Effect of project management practices on performance of public housing construction projects in Kenya: A case study of Mombasa County. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 7(4), 1547–1566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v7i4.1882

Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (7th ed.). PMI.

Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

UN-Habitat. (2019). Housing at the centre: The role of implementation in achieving sustainable development. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

UNDP. (2022). Results-based management handbook: Strengthening RBM in UNDP. United Nations Development Programme.

Valencia, J., Mugisha, J., & Nuwagaba, A. (2022). Systems thinking in project management: A holistic approach to project success. Project Management Journal, 53(2), 145–158.

von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.

World Bank. (2017). Development projects: Trends and performance. World Bank Publications.

Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Leruk, H., & Kithandi, C. K. (2026). Effect of Monitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and Learning (MEAL) Practices on Project Performance of the Integrated Housing Projects in Laikipia County, Kenya. East African Finance Journal, 5(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.59413/eafj/v5.i2.7

Article PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics