Systemic Challenges and Reform Pathways for Enhancing Pension Scheme Effectiveness: Empirical Evidence from Zambia’s National Pension Scheme Authority

Authors

  • Florence Phiri Graduate School of Business , University of Zambia image/svg+xml Author
  • Dr. Romeo Yohane Graduate School of Business , University of Zambia image/svg+xml Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v7.i3.3

Keywords:

Pension Schemes, Challenges, NAPSA, Zambia, Service Delivery

Abstract

The National Pension Scheme Authority (NAPSA) is Zambia’s central statutory body mandated to provide income security against retirement, invalidity, and death. Despite notable institutional growth, NAPSA continues to grapple with persistent structural and operational challenges that constrain its ability to deliver effective pension services. This study assessed the principal challenges affecting pension payments and coverage, examined their influence on pension system effectiveness, and identified actionable strategies to enhance service delivery. Using a mixed-methods design, data were collected from 307 survey respondents and three key informant interviews with NAPSA directors. Quantitative findings revealed pervasive challenges, including administrative delays (65.2%), payment delays that diminish confidence (88.6%), inadequate technological systems (51.1%), difficulties enrolling eligible contributors (67.4%), and weaknesses in management and coordination (77.2%). These challenges had a statistically significant negative influence on pension system effectiveness, confirmed by the Kruskal–Wallis test (X² = 133.7, p = 0.0001) and regression analysis (coefficients = 0.26–0.27, p = 0.001). Respondents strongly supported reforms such as digital system upgrades, staff capacity enhancement, improved monitoring and evaluation, expanded public awareness, and strengthened stakeholder partnerships. Qualitative insights underscored compliance challenges, reliance on manual processes, investment limitations, and the urgency of digitized national identification systems. The study concludes that NAPSA’s pension scheme effectiveness is compromised by systemic administrative and technological inefficiencies but can be substantially improved through targeted reforms centered on digital transformation, institutional strengthening, and inclusive coverage expansion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barr, N. (2020) The pension system: Legitimacy and sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dawood, S. (2022) Informal economy and social security in Zambia. Lusaka: Policy Monitoring and Research Centre.

Devereux, S. and White, P. (2007) ‘Social protection in Africa: Evidence, politics and rights’, IDS Bulletin, 38(3), pp. 32–44.

Durán-Valverde, F. and Pacheco, J.F. (2022) ‘Expanding social protection to informal workers’, International Social Security Review, 75(2), pp. 3–25.

Gelepithis, M. (2018) ‘Donor influence and pension reform in Africa’, Journal of Development Studies, 54(9), pp. 1620–1635.

Godman, B., Gourfinkel, D. and colleagues (2022) ‘Public sector reforms and pension implementation in Africa’, Global Health Policy Review, 14(2), pp. 77–89.

HelpAge International (2023) Pension coverage in Africa: Trends and challenges. London: HelpAge International.

International Labour Organization (ILO) (1952) Convention No. 102: Minimum standards of social security. Geneva: ILO.

International Labour Organization (ILO) (2019) Social protection systems in Africa: Policy priorities. Geneva: ILO.

International Labour Organization (ILO) (2021) World Social Protection Report 2020–22. Geneva: ILO.

International Labour Organization (ILO) (2024) World Social Protection Report 2024–26. Geneva: ILO.

Labour Institute of Zambia (2015) Employment and social security coverage trends. Lusaka: Labour Institute of Zambia.

Madimutsa, T. and Pretorius, J. (2020) ‘Trade unions and public sector reforms in Zambia’, African Labour Studies Journal, 15(2), pp. 101–118.

Miti, J., et al. (2023) ‘Extending social security to informal workers in Zambia’, African Journal of Social Protection, 18(2), pp. 88–104.

NAPSA (2022) Strategic Plan 2022–2026. Lusaka: National Pension Scheme Authority.

NAPSA (2023) Annual Report 2023. Lusaka: National Pension Scheme Authority.

OECD (2022) Pensions at a Glance 2022. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD (2023) Pensions Outlook 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Siachiwena, H. and Seekings, J. (2024) ‘Politics and social protection expansion in Zambia’, African Affairs, 123(492), pp. 201–223.

Siyumbano, M. and Kaira, B. (2024) ‘Fiscal implications of pension investment strategies in Zambia’, Zambian Economic Review, 10(2), pp. 55–72.

UNU-WIDER (2025) Pension systems in low-income countries: Challenges and reforms. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.

Winkler, H., et al. (2017) ‘Fraud and corruption in African pension systems’, Journal of Public Administration, 52(3), pp. 211–229.

World Bank (2020) World Development Report 2020: Pension systems and social protection. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Yohane, M., et al. (2021) ‘University pension debt and fiscal strain in Zambia’, African Journal of Public Finance, 15(2), pp. 122–139.

Yohane, M., Mwanza, L. and Chowa, G. (2022) ‘Regional disparities and pension adequacy in Zambia’, Zambian Journal of Economics and Policy, 6(3), pp. 77–95.

Zambia Statistics Agency (2022) Living Conditions Monitoring Survey Report 2022. Lusaka: ZamStats.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Phiri, F., & Yohane, R. (2026). Systemic Challenges and Reform Pathways for Enhancing Pension Scheme Effectiveness: Empirical Evidence from Zambia’s National Pension Scheme Authority. African Journal of Commercial Studies, 7(3), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v7.i3.3

Article PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)