Assessing the Impacts of Exchange Rate Volatility on Donor-Funded Projects: The Case of iDE Zambia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v7.i3.18Keywords:
Exchange-rate volatility, Donor-funded programmes, Financial performance, Programme resilience, Mixed methods, ERPT theory, Contingency Theory, Development effectiveness, ZambiaAbstract
Exchange-rate volatility remains a critical constraint on donor-funded development programmes in low- and middle-income countries, yet its transmission mechanisms across programme and beneficiary levels remain insufficiently understood. This study examines the effects of exchange-rate volatility on financial performance, operational efficiency, and social outcomes of donor-funded programmes in Zambia, using iDE Zambia as a case study over the period 2015–2025. A mixed-methods approach was employed, integrating econometric trend analysis, regression modelling, and descriptive statistics with qualitative insights from surveys (n = 157), key informant interviews, and document review. The analysis is grounded in Exchange Rate Pass-Through (ERPT) theory and Contingency Theory to explain how macroeconomic shocks influence organisational performance and development outcomes. Findings reveal that the Zambian Kwacha depreciated by over 300% against the US dollar during the study period, with notable volatility spikes in 2016 and 2020. Regression results indicate statistically significant effects of exchange-rate volatility on financial disruption (β = 0.68, p < 0.001), operational inefficiency (β = 0.59, p < 0.001), and adverse social outcomes (β = 0.63, p < 0.001). At the programme level, volatility contributed to budget erosion, procurement cost escalation, and implementation delays. At the beneficiary level, it reduced access to inputs, lowered productivity, and weakened household incomes. The study concludes that exchange-rate volatility operates as a multi-level development constraint, transmitting macroeconomic shocks through programme systems to household welfare. It highlights the inadequacy of reactive mitigation approaches and emphasises the need for adaptive financing frameworks, proactive risk management, and enhanced institutional resilience in donor programming.
Downloads
References
Aghion, P. et al. (2021) Exchange rate volatility and development outcomes.
Auer, R. et al. (2021) Exchange rate pass-through in emerging markets.
Bank of Zambia (2024) Annual Economic Report.
Barrett, C. and Carter, M. (2021) Agricultural development and resilience.
Bryman, A. (2016) Social Research Methods.
Caselli, F. and Roitman, A. (2019) Non-linear exchange rate pass-through. IMF.
Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2018) Research Design.
Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. (2018) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research.
Diao, X. et al. (2020) Economic shocks and rural livelihoods.
Donaldson, L. (2018) Contingency Theory of Organizations.
Edwards, S. (2019) Exchange rate misalignment in developing countries.
FAO (2022) State of Food and Agriculture.
Gopinath, G. et al. (2020) Dominant Currency Paradigm.
IMF (2023) Zambia Country Report.
Kharas, H. (2021) Development finance trends.
OECD (2021) Development Co-operation Report.
Rogoff, K. (2017) Purchasing Power Parity Puzzle Revisited.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2019) Research Methods for Business Students.
Senadza, B. (2020) Exchange rate volatility and fiscal stability.
UNDP (2022) Development Finance in Volatile Economies.
UNECA (2021) Economic Report on Africa.
UNECA (2021) Macroeconomic Stability in Africa.
World Bank (2022) Global Economic Prospects.
World Bank (2023) Africa’s Pulse.
Yin, R.K. (2018) Case Study Research and Applications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Majorie Siamwaala, Dr. Yohane Romeo (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.








