Challenges Experienced by Job Seekers During the Qualification Verification Process Conducted by the Zambia Qualifications Authority (ZAQA): Evidence from Ndola District, Zambia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v7.i5.6

Keywords:

Qualification Verification, Job Seekers, ZAQA, Employment Opportunities, Systems Theory, Ndola District, Zambia

Abstract

Qualification verification is an important component of education and employment systems because it establishes the authenticity, validity and recognition of academic and professional qualifications. In Zambia, the Zambia Qualifications Authority (ZAQA) is responsible for coordinating qualification recognition and verification. However, job seekers may encounter challenges during the verification process that can affect their participation in recruitment processes. This study examined the challenges experienced by job seekers during the qualification verification process conducted by ZAQA in Ndola District, Zambia, assessed how these challenges affect employment opportunities, and identified strategies for improving verification services. The study adopted a mixed-methods research approach using a descriptive research design and a convergent parallel mixed-methods design. Data were collected from 150 participants comprising 145 job seekers who completed structured questionnaires and five ZAQA officials who participated in semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using frequencies and percentages, while qualitative data were analysed thematically. The study was guided by Systems Theory. The findings revealed that long processing time was the most frequently reported challenge, accounting for 33.1% of job seekers, followed by high verification fees (21.4%), poor communication and feedback (16.6%), technical challenges with the online system (13.1%), repeated submission of documents (10.3%), and limited accessibility to ZAQA services (5.5%). The challenges affected employment opportunities mainly through delayed recruitment processes (38.6%), missed employment opportunities (23.4%), increased financial burdens (17.9%), reduced motivation to apply for jobs (11.7%), and loss of employer confidence (8.4%). Respondents identified faster processing, improved communication, stronger online verification systems, reduced verification fees, increased staffing and improved institutional collaboration as key strategies for improving the system. The study concludes that qualification verification should be treated as an interconnected service-delivery system involving ZAQA, applicants, educational institutions, technology and employers. Improving coordination among these components is essential for reducing delays and enhancing employment outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

African Union Commission. (2021). African Continental Qualifications Framework. Addis Ababa: African Union.

Becker, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001

Brown, P., & Souto Otero, M. (2020). The role of qualifications and skills recognition in labour markets. Journal of Education and Work, 33(5), 345–362.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

International Labour Organization. (2022). Global Employment Trends for Youth 2022: Investing in Transforming Futures. ILO.

Kumar, R. (2020). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mahlobo, M. (2022). Qualification verification challenges and graduate employment outcomes in Africa. African Journal of Education Studies, 15(2), 44–58.

Mlambo, V. (2020). Higher education quality assurance challenges in Africa. Journal of African Studies and Development, 12(3), 45–56.

Mncwango, B., & Mkhize, N. (2022). Qualification recognition and graduate employability in South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(4), 88–104.

Nyerere, J., & Wanjala, M. (2021). National qualification frameworks and recognition of skills in Kenya. African Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 15–27.

OECD. (2022). [Qualification recognition and labour-market related source cited in the research report]. OECD Publishing.

Phiri, J., & Banda, M. (2021). Public service delivery challenges in Zambia: A focus on administrative efficiency and service provision.

Republic of Zambia. (2011). Zambia Qualifications Authority Act No. 13 of 2011. Government of the Republic of Zambia.

Taherdoost, H. (2021). Data collection methods and tools for research: A step-by-step guide to choosing data collection technique for academic and business research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 10(1), 10–38.

UNESCO. (2021). Global Education Monitoring Report 2021/22: Non-state Actors in Education. UNESCO.

von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.

ZAQA. (2022). Zambia Qualifications Authority institutional and qualification verification information. Zambia Qualifications Authority.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-02

How to Cite

Chalwe, R., & Mundia, M. (2026). Challenges Experienced by Job Seekers During the Qualification Verification Process Conducted by the Zambia Qualifications Authority (ZAQA): Evidence from Ndola District, Zambia. African Journal of Commercial Studies, 7(5), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v7.i5.6

Article PlumX Metrics

PlumX Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)