Determinants and Implications of Consumer Complaint Behaviour in Emerging Economies: A Legal and Empirical Critique from Zambia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v6.i2.23Keywords:
consumer protection, complaint behaviour, Zambia, perceived behavioural control, consumer awareness, product liability, unfair trade practices, judicial enforcementAbstract
Understanding the behavioural intentions of consumers to lodge complaints against unfair trade practices is fundamental to effective consumer protection regimes, particularly in developing jurisdictions such as Zambia. This article investigates the determinant factors influencing consumer complaint behaviour, the prevalence and typology of consumer rights violations, the efficacy of consumer protection legislation, and the limitations of judicial enforcement mechanisms in Zambia. Adopting a doctrinal and socio-legal methodology, the article synthesises empirical literature, doctrinal analysis, and judicial precedents to establish a conceptual framework of complaint behavioural intentions. It identifies consumer rights awareness, attitudes, subjective norms, prior experiences, perceived behavioural control, personality traits, and behavioural beliefs as major determinants of complaint behaviour. Furthermore, it appraises selected case law to demonstrate structural and evidentiary constraints in judicial enforcement. The study concludes that consumer redress mechanisms in Zambia remain underutilised due to knowledge asymmetries, procedural complexity, and institutional weaknesses. It recommends a rights-based and empirically informed reform strategy to enhance the legitimacy and efficacy of Zambia’s consumer protection regime.
Downloads
References
Competition and Consumer Protection Act No 24 of 2010
Food and Drugs Act, Chapter 303 of the Laws of Zambia
Constitution of Zambia (Amendment) Act No 2 of 2016
Michael Chilufya Sata MP v Bottlers Zambia Limited (1994) ZR 125 (SC)
Onyejekwe v Nigerian Breweries Ltd [1974] NCLR 538
Gbekeji Bottling Co Ltd v Akerele (1972) 1 All NLR 456
Ransome-Kuti v Attorney-General of the Federation [1985] 2 NWLR (Pt 6) 211
International Instruments
United Nations, Guidelines for Consumer Protection (adopted 22 December 2015) UN Doc A/RES/70/186
Charlesworth & Percy, Charlesworth on Negligence (13th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2014)
Horner S and Swarbrooke J, Consumer Behaviour in Tourism (3rd edn, Routledge 2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003046721
Bello R, Aduke M and Danjuma Y, ‘An Empirical Review of the Consumer Protection Act 2004 in Nigeria’ (2019) 6(3) African Journal of Law and Society 19
Badghish SA, ‘Determinants of Complaint Behaviour among Online Consumers in Saudi Arabia’ (2021) 7(1) International Journal of Marketing Research 55
Sallaberry ML et al, ‘Complaint Intentions of Digital Consumers: The Role of Behavioural Beliefs and Perceived Control’ (2024) 13(1) Electronic Commerce Research 1
Ependi R and Riyanta A, ‘Perceived Behavioural Control and Consumer Redress: An Empirical Study’ (2020) 5(4) Asian Journal of Consumer Psychology 67
Rehman A et al, ‘Social Norms and Complaint Behaviour in Developing Economies’ (2022) 8(2) Journal of Consumer Affairs in Emerging Markets 89
Mubiana T, ‘Consumer Protection Enforcement in Zambia: An Evaluation of Institutional Effectiveness’ (LLM thesis, University of Zambia 2021)
Kyomugisha M, ‘Ineffectiveness of Consumer Protection Laws in Uganda: A Doctrinal Appraisal’ (2020) East African Law Review Working Paper Series
Anand V and Kumari S, ‘Implementation Challenges of India’s Consumer Protection Act’ (2021) India Law and Policy Review Working Paper No 14
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alex Chola Kafwabulula, Austin Mwange (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.








