Comparing the Explanatory Power of the Fama–French Five-Factor and Carhart Four-Factor Models in a Frontier Equity Market: Evidence from the Lusaka Securities Exchange (LuSE)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v7.i3.56Keywords:
Frontier Markets, Asset Pricing, Lusaka Securities Exchange, Fama-French Five-Factor Model, Carhart Four-Factor Model, CAPM, Momentum Effect, Profitability Factor, ZambiaAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to test the explanatory power of the Carhart Four-Factor Model (C4FM) and the Fama-French Five-Factor Model (FF5FM) in the Lusaka Securities Exchange (LuSE), a frontier market that is characterized by low liquidity, thin trading, information asymmetry and market inefficiency where the CAPM has been found to perform poorly in explaining stock returns. The study uses standard Fama-French and Carhart portfolio formation procedures.
Methodology: This study employed a deductive quantitative research design and collected data on the return of the 20 LuSE listed firms (listed on the main board) on a monthly basis between January 2022 and December 2025 (48 months). Data are sourced from LuSE, company reports and Bank of Zambia. The explanatory power of the factors (market, size, value, profitability, investment and momentum) is tested using time series OLS regressions. The two factor models (FF5FM and C4FM) are compared based on regression intercepts, mean absolute price error, GR S tests and modified R-squared.
Results: The Fama French Five-Factor Model (FF5FM) exhibits better overall explanatory performance over the Carhart Four-Factor Model (C4FM) with a slightly higher average adjusted R-squared of 0.931, a minimum average absolute pricing error of 0.39% and a statistically non-significant intercept at the 5% level of significance for all types. The C4FM performed pretty well with a mean adjusted R-squared of 0.924 and a mean error of 0.44% which indicates that both frameworks have strong explanatory power in the setting of the LuSE frontier market.
Unique contribution: The unique contribution of this study is the investigation of asset pricing in frontier markets and being one of the few studies that directly compare the FF5FM and the C4FM, especially in the African market. Information and Policy Implications for Investors, Portfolio Managers and Development of Zambia’s Capital Markets.
Downloads
References
(PDF) A Comparative Study of the Fama-French Three Factor and the Carhart Four Factor Models: Empirical Evidence from Morocco. Available from: [accessed Jun 01 2026].
A. T. Hossain (2022). Asset pricing, investment, and profitability in developing economies. Finance and Trade in Emerging Markets, 58(11), 3221–3241.
Abrache, J., and Tazi, K. (2022). the Casablanca Stock Exchange's momentum factor. Cogent Finance & Economics, 10(1), 2127483.
Adegoke, S., Adelaja, A., & Onifade, A. (2024). Reconciling momentum and profitability anomalies in emerging stock markets. Journal of Asset Management, 25(3), 211–234.
Aguenaou, S., Abrache, J., Kadiri, B.E. (2011), Testing the Fama-Frenchthree factor model in the Moroccan stock market. InternationalJournal of Business, Accounting, and Finance, 5(2), 1-10
An empirical study of the Fama-French-Carhart multifactor model: UK Evidence, Nwani, C. (2015). Sharpe, W. F. (1964) IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance, 6, 95-10. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium in risky situations. Journal of Finance, 19(3), 425-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x
Asness, C., Frazzini, A., Israel, R., & Moskowitz, T. (2019). Fact and fiction in factor investing. Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(7), 5–28.
Atodaria, A. (2025). Momentum effects in emerging Asia: Evidence from India and Malaysia. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 89, 102105.
Britten, J., and Cox, S. (2019). The Johannesburg Stock Exchange provides evidence for the Fama-French five-factor model. Journal of Investment Analysts, 48(4), 240-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2019.1647982
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
French, K. R., and Fama, E. F. (1993). common risk factors for bond and stock returns. Financial Economics Journal, 33(1), 3–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
French, K. R., and Fama, E. F. (2004). Theory and evidence for the capital asset price model. Economic Perspectives Journal, 18(3), 25–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330042162430
French, K. R., and Fama, E. F. (2015). An asset price model using five factors. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1–22. Foye, J. (2018). The Fama-French five-factor model is thoroughly tested in emerging markets. Review of Emerging Markets, 37, 199–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.10.010
J. Lintner (1965). the selection of risky investments for capital budgets and stock portfolios, as well as the valuation of risk assets. Economics and Statistics Review, 47(1), 13–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1924119
J. Mossin (1966). equilibrium in the market for capital assets. 34(4), Econometrica, 768-783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1910098
M. Claesson (2021). Local or universal? Multi-factor asset pricing comparisons across 30 stock markets. 75, 101737, International Review of Financial Analysis.
Peter, F. J., and Dirkx, P. (2020). The German market is supported by the Fama-French five-factor model. 53(2), 187–222, Credit and Capital Markets.
S. Mosoeu (2022). Evidence from emerging markets regarding profitability and the cross-section of stock returns. Review of Emerging Markets, 51, 100898.
Shanken, J., Ross, S. A., and Gibbons, M. R. (1989). an evaluation of a portfolio's effectiveness. Econometrica, 57(5), 1121-1152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913625
Shikaputo, C., Kapena, S., and Musawa, N. (2018). The Fama-French five-factor model is being tested on the Lusaka Securities Exchange. 6(7), 1–14, International Journal of Economics, Commerce, and Management.
Smith, B., Shi, R., and Kamstra, M. (2024). evaluating factor models using intercept tests and pricing errors. Asset Pricing Studies Review, 14(1), 89–131.
Titman, S., and Jegadeesh, N. (1993). The efficiency of the stock market is affected by returns from purchasing winners and selling losers. Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x
Valentinčič, A., and J. Foye (2020). Indonesian factor models are being tested. Review of Emerging Markets, 42, 100665.
Zhang, L., Xue, C., and Hou, K. (2020). reproducing abnormalities. Financial Studies Review, 33(5), 2019–2133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy131
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Danicious Kalenga, Benjamin Kaira, Jackson Sishumba, Lukundo Willy Siwilanji (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.








