Examination of the effects of the National Pension Scheme Authority Partial Withdrawal on the Socio-economic Status of Contributors in Lusaka District, Zambia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59413/ajocs/v7.i3.55Keywords:
Pension Reform, Partial Withdrawal, NAPSA, Socioeconomic Status, Financial Literacy, ZambiaAbstract
This study examined the socioeconomic effects of the National Pension Scheme Authority (NAPSA) partial withdrawal policy on contributors in Lusaka District, Zambia. Introduced through the National Pension Scheme Amendment Act No. 21 of 2023, the policy permits eligible contributors to access up to 20% of their accumulated pension savings before retirement. Using a mixed-methods approach, quantitative data was collected from 328 contributors through structured questionnaires, while qualitative data was obtained from 40 key informants comprising beneficiaries, non-beneficiaries, NAPSA officials, and financial experts. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, and chi-square tests, while qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed that the primary motivations for accessing partial withdrawals were meeting household expenses, debt repayment, housing development, and business investment. Beneficiaries reported moderate improvements in quality of life, financial independence, and ability to support family members. Significant positive relationships were observed between withdrawal effectiveness and quality of life (r = 0.377), financial independence (r = 0.668), social confidence (r = 0.385), and community participation (r = 0.305). However, many respondents reported that financial improvements were temporary when funds were used primarily for consumption rather than productive investments. The study concludes that while the policy has generated short-term socioeconomic benefits, its long-term impact depends largely on financial literacy and fund utilization patterns. The study recommends strengthening financial literacy programmes and enhancing investment guidance for contributors prior to accessing withdrawals.
Downloads
References
(OECD), O. f. E. C.-o. a. D., 2022. Pensions at a Glance , Paris: OECD Publishing.
(UNDP), U. N. D. P., 2016. Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone., New York: UNDP.
Abels, M. & Guven, M. U., 2016. Pension Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa, s.l.: World Bank Group. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/25287
Balance, T., 2021. What is a Partial Withdrawal?. 15 5.
Banda, B., 2024. Qualitative Analysis of Early Pension Withdrawal in Defined Benefit Schemes: A Case National Pension Scheme Authority (NAPSA) in Zambia, Lusaka: ZCAS.
Chiwele, K., 2023. Policy Monitoring and Research Centre. [Online]
Available at: https://pmrczambia.com/pmrc-blog-enhancing-flexibility-and-control-in-zambias-pension-scheme-government-signs-napsa-bill-on-partial-withdrawal-into-law/ [Accessed 30 May 2024].
Creswell, J., 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. s.l.:SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. P. C. V., 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Egbe, G., 2013. Portfolio Optimization of Pension Fund Contribution in Nigeria. Math. Theory Model, 3(8).
ILO, 1984. Social Security: Introduction to Social Security, Geneva: International Labour Office.
ILO, 2009. Global Employment Trends Update, May 2009, Geneva: International Labour Office.
ILO, 2010. World Social Security Report 2010/11, Providing Coverage in times of Crisis and Beyond,, Geneva: ILO.
Investopedia, 2021. Partial Withdrawal.
Kalusopa, T. e. a., 2015. Social Protection Schemes in Africa, Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
Koszegi B, R. M., 2007. Mistakes in Choice Based Welfare Analysis. Am.. Econ, 97(2), pp. 477-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.2.477
Leng, O. e. a., 2016. Policies and Protections for Ageing Society In Malaysia.
Lusardi, A. a. M. O., 2014. The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), p. 5–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.52.1.5
Mambwe, R. &. M. C., 2016. AN ASSESSMENT OF PREPARATION LEVEL, SURVIVAL SKILLS, AND ENTREPRENEURIAL KNOWLEDGE AMONG RETIRED TEACHERS IN ZAMBIA, Lusaka: University of Zambia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21083/ajote.v5i1.3512
M'membe, D. F., 2023. The Zambian Observer. [Online] Available at: https://zambianobserver.com/there-are-fundamental-issues-on-the-napsa-partial-withdrawal-dr-fred-mmembe/ [Accessed 16 October 2024].
Mukul, A. e. a., 2015. An Analysis of Selected Pension and Health Care Initiatives for Informal Sector Workers in India. 21 October.
Mulenga, N., 2019. An evaluation of social security legislation and policy in Zambia against international legal instruments, Lusaka: University of Zambia.
NAPSA, 2023. NAPSA. [Online] Available at: https://www.napsa.co.zm/the-pre-retirement-lumpsum-benefit-is-here/ [Accessed 16 October 2024].
NAPSA, 2024. About Us.
NAPSA, 2024. Our Services.
Omoni, G., 2013. An Overview of the New Pension Scheme and Teachers Level of Awareness in Delta State of Nigeria. Counseling Complications.
PENCOM, 2004. Highlights of the Contributory Pension Scheme in Nigeria, s.l.: s.n.
Samuelson, P., 1950. Programme of Integrality in Utility Theory. J. Econ, Volume 58, pp. 65-84.
Sojo, A., 2014. The Chilean System of Contributory Pensions as Locus of Rivalry and of a New Social. Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.
Vlachantoni, A. e. a., 2016. Ethnic elders and pension protection in the United Kingdom. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16000143
Wei, H. &. Z. C., 2021. The Power of Social Pensions: Evidence from China's New Rural Pension Scheme. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, , 13(2), pp. 179-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170789
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yande Muyamba, Dr. Kasonde Mundende (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.








